Monday, October 26, 2015

Why did John omit the Temptation story in his Gospel narrative?


Question: Why do you think John omits The Temptation story in his Gospel narrative? Was he simply forgetful, or perhaps did not feel it was all that important in order to understand the real Jesus?

Answer: Firstly, I believe that John was fully aware of the Temptation episode in the life of Jesus. However, John had a particular audience in mind when he wrote his gospel. It is possible that he also knew that both Mark and Matthew, and perhaps even Luke had sufficiently covered the event, so why repeat. As a matter of fact, about 90% percent of John’s gospel cannot be found in the synoptic gospels. There are no doubt several reasons for this. One is quite obvious. He says in closing, “Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written (John 21:24-25).” So, it appears that he wanted to economize his words in other to cover those themes he wished to present. This he does by the use of metaphors—that is, Jesus is the light of the world; the vine; the bread and wine, and so-forth. A metaphor can tell a story in much less space than can a descriptive narrative of the event. Furthermore, John’s intended audience was that of secular and pagan society, both of which, loved to philosophize. Therefore, I believe that chose the more philosophical approach (“In the beginning was the Word” i.e., the Divine Logos) to appeal the non-Jewish population.

Now as far as John’s acquaintance with the history of Jesus, he was in the inner circle, present at Jesus’ baptism; there when Jesus left the disciples and went into the desert and was tempted; and, of course, was present at the Transfiguration. He was also at the Last Supper and near him in the Garden of Gethsemane as well as at the Crucifixion at which time the scripture says,
When Jesus then saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing nearby, He said to His mother, "Woman, behold, your son!" Then He said to the disciple, "Behold, your mother!" From that hour the disciple took her into his own household (John 19:26-27).”[i]
Since John was then the disciple to whom Jesus asked to look after his mother, it so also be assumed that John had the advantage of talking to her about the life of her son. Then there is one other bit of information that John gives us when he writes:
“This is the disciple who testifies to these things and who wrote them down. We know that his testimony is true. Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written (John 21:24-25).” 
You were right, however, as far as we know that John was written last in the Gospel order—according to ancient testimony, Jerome, et a.—sometime I believe prior to 70 A.D. before the Roman general Titus razed the Jewish Temple “not leaving one stone left on another; [and that] every stone will be thrown down (Matthew 24:2; Mark 13:2)" as predicted by Christ.

The reason that I have come to the conclusion that John was written prior to the destruction of the Temple is that this destruction was of such enormous significance that I cannot see the event not mentioned in any of the New Testament documents.

Now, it is true that John could have had a bad memory, however, he does cover his tracks with: “This is the disciple who testifies to these things and who wrote them down.” And, further, he writes, “We know that his testimony is true.” Which of course includes the testimony of others when he says, “We know that his testimony is true . . .” This statement is no doubt added to reinforce and confirm John’s testimony.

Trust this is sufficient.


Jim_/







[i] Church history tells us that the apostle John lived into the A.D. 90s and was the last surviving apostle. Early church tradition was unanimous in identifying John as the disciple whom Jesus loved. It seems that John had a closer relationship with Jesus than any of the other disciples. Jesus and John were essentially “best friends.” Jesus entrusted John with the care of His mother, gave John the vision of the transfiguration, allowed John to witness His most amazing miracles, and later gave John the Book of Revelation. (Source: http://www.gotquestions.org/disciple-whom-Jesus-loved.html)

No comments: