Friday, October 23, 2015

Dionysius the Great (AD 248-265) on the Trinity


The Ontological and Economic Trinity


How can God be a trinity, yet one? This we explain by adopting the concept of an ontological Trinity; which simply means that the essence of the Godhead is that of the personhoods of The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit. Each person in the Godhead is of the same eternal ontology—that is essence (nature) differing only in relationship. So, we can say as he said of himself: “I and [my] Father are one (John 10:30 KJV).” Theologians, however, distinguish between what God is—that is his ontology; and what God does. God is ontologically a Trinity; what God does—that is, how He conducts business, is called the economic Trinity (economic, from the Greek oikonomikos, which means relating to arrangement of activities). Debate on who God is has long been settled in the Church; however, how God works—that is, arranges His activities is still controversial. More about that later; but first, let’s consider how God can be ontologically a trinity, yet one.
One of the early Church Fathers put it this way:
“A word is an effluence (that which flows out from) from intelligence, and to speak as men do, the intelligence that issues forth by mean of the tongue is derived from the heart and passes through the mouth; and it is different from the word which exists in the heart. For after sending the other forth, the latter remains as it was. But the other, which was sent froth, flies off and is carried about in every direction. And thus each is in the other, and each is distinct from the other. They are one, and thus each is in the other, and each is one, and at the same time there are two. Likewise, the Father and the Son were said to be one, and in each other” Dionysius the Great (AD 248-265) 
Interestingly, Jesus is called the Word of God and from God, thus Jesus as the express image of his, who bears the very stamp of His (God’s) nature and became superior to the angels as the name he obtained is more excellent that their (Cf. Hebrews 1:1-4).
Now, as consider this passage in relation to both the ontological and economic Trinity, we see a praxis not of Divine essence, but rather of potentiality in and of the Word as it progresses through Godly intentions in the workings of His will (cf. 1 Corinthians 12:6) and in particular in the life of Jesus as the Son of Man. Thus, we must understand that for all practical purposes the three persons in the Godhead are united in purpose and kind, and are of the same Godly essence (cf. Colossians 1:19 with 2:9). Therefore, we are complete in Him which is the head of all principality and power (Colossians 2:10 KJV).
What a wonderful possibility. What a wonderful though, that God in His fulness may also dwell in us (cf. John 14:17; Romans 8:9; Romans 8:11; 1 Corinthians 3:16) and we are complete in Him (Colossians 2:10).

No comments: