"Me? No, never went to seminary. I'm self appointed. What about you?" ***** |
*****
Clive Staples Lewis,
best known as C. S. Lewis, was a fascinating individual. Although,
baptized in the Church of Ireland and raised in a Christian home Lewis
was an avid atheist by age 15—about which, he later humorously
said he was angry with God for not existing. Eventually, he did come
around, however, and although reluctantly at first fully embraced Christ
as Savior and Lord of his life. Here is his abbreviated account as
recorded in his book, Surprised by Joy:
"You
must picture me alone in that room in Magdalen, night after night,
feeling, whenever my mind lifted even for a second from my work, the
steady, unrelenting approach of Him whom I so earnestly desired not to
meet. That which I greatly feared had at last come upon me. In the
Trinity Term of 1929 I gave in, and admitted that God was God, and knelt
and prayed: perhaps, that night, the most dejected and reluctant
convert in all England."
Those
sentiments did not last for long, however. From that day forward, he
set out on a path of inquiry and discovery that few have ever been able
to match. An Anglican by persuasion, although not afraid to follow his
spiritual intuitions to their logical conclusions even if it did mean
that at times he appeared as more of a Roman Catholic than Anglican, he
nonetheless insisted that he was in truth neither, he was merely a
Christian.
I
find that refreshing. For the older I get, the more I am persuaded that
we need to rethink our theological rigidity and remain open to new
insights from the Holy Spirit—after all, Christ did say that He
would lead us into all truth. Therefore, we mustn't be timid when
challenged from those on the right of the theological spectrum or those
on the left. Christ has not left us without answers—not always pat answers, but solid answers none the less.
Christ like the noon day sun cast throws light on all the dark spots of uncertainty in our lives and he has not left us without a compass to chart our course, either.
We
have the "Church the pillar and foundation of all truth (1 Timothy
3:15)"; and we also have Scripture that "is God-breathed and is useful
for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so
that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work
(2 Timothy 2:15-17)."
We
dare not ignore either, since to ignore the accrued wisdom of the
Church or the infallible word of God in order that we may be thoroughly
equipped for every good work is sheer foolishness. We need both. Without
the Church we are left to grope for words like the Trinity or the
Incarnation—although the concepts are in Scripture, the words are not, and it took centuries to sort out what they truly mean.
Without the Church we would have no Apostles Creed, really no theology
except that which we could think up on our own; and God knows where that
would lead considering the some 33,000 denominations and independent
churches in the world today.
No,
we need the Church. But first we must define the Church. What is the
Church? Now, the burning question: Is it possible to be in the Church
(that is in the ecclesia) and not be able to identify it? In other
words, is the Church invisible like the Kingdom of God, heartfelt but
elusive to the eye?
The
early Church had a saying: "Where the Bishop is, there is the Chruch."
With that I agree with one simple caveat, that is "which Bishop are we
talking about?"
The
early Church had a saying: "Where the Bishop is, there is the Church."
With that I agree with one simple caveat—that is, "It all depends on
which Bishop are we talking about?" A lot of crazies are around today
wearing clerical collars calling themselves “Bishop.” Some have even
given themselves the lofty title of “Apostle” and “Prophet” to which I
reply, “Let another's lips praise you and not your own.” Furthermore,
where in Scripture did anyone ever refer to themselves as a “prophet?”
Friends, that’s not a title up for grabs, it must be earned the old
fashioned way, so prepare yourself for the stones if you get this one
wrong. Problem is we tread on dangerous grounds when we flip these
titles around as if they are ours to choose. So, my advice is that we be
careful or we just might offend someone, namely, God.
Now, to define which bishop, why don’t we just stop with Jesus—the Shepherd and Bishop of our souls (1 Peter 2:25)? He does the calling, the anointing, and indeed the empowering. Personally, I think that this is in keeping with the spirit of Scripture in which Christ tells not to call any man Lord, Master, or Father.
Again, however, this is just one man's opinion, so take care—
JimR_/
Now, to define which bishop, why don’t we just stop with Jesus—the Shepherd and Bishop of our souls (1 Peter 2:25)? He does the calling, the anointing, and indeed the empowering. Personally, I think that this is in keeping with the spirit of Scripture in which Christ tells not to call any man Lord, Master, or Father.
Again, however, this is just one man's opinion, so take care—
JimR_/
No comments:
Post a Comment