"The Hell," you say?

Evangelical theologians are notoriously politically correct within the system. Question an archaic doctrine that at the very least needs clarification is ministerial suicide for some. Take, for example, the doctrine of Hell. Question that in light of “only God has immortality (1 Timothy 6:16)” and see how far you get in average Evangelical circles. Need I go any further?

Some of the greatest minds in theology have expressed contradictory views vis-à-vis Evangelical “orthodoxy” such as: Hans Urs von Balthazar, C. S. Lewis, John R. W. Stott, William Barclay, Clark Pinnock—needless to say, also, that the Church Fathers both early and late did not agree on this, nor did the Reformers; they did, however, discuss the issue. May I quote just one of the greatest theologians of all time, who wrote: “In Hell there is no true eternity but rather time (St. Thomas Aquinas)?” Most assuredly St. Thomas Aquinas must have had the same thought in mind as did Isaiah who wrote much earlier: “Your sun will never set again, and your moon will wane no more; the LORD will be your everlasting light, and your days of sorrow will end (Isaiah 60:20)?”

In Scripture, Hell (or the fires of geennan/γέενναν) is confined to a cycle of days and nights; whereas, Heaven has no night, only day, for “He is the light thereof (Revelation 21:23).” Not so with Hell which is confined to a determine cycle of day and night until it is thrown into the Lake of Fire; after which, it can be argued only the “smoke of their torment (from the fires of geennan) (Revelation 14:11)” can be seen as a proof of the effectiveness of this consuming fire.

Now, consider with me for a moment what the implications of these verses of Scripture are—keeping in mind, of course, that sola scriptura does not take place in a vacuum. Reason has its proper place in theology as well, as does moral justice and fairness. Well, for one there is a judgment day and that there is punishment is a given, as Immanuel Kant pointed out so many years ago. However, we Protestants have thrown the baby out with the bath water and restricted that punishment to punitive punishment only. Remedial punishment a more sensible recourse is completely off limits.

Do I buy into the whole “liberal” approach, lock stock and barrel? Certainly not. However, perhaps it would serve us well to take into consideration that it took at least three-and-one-quarter centuries for the doctrine of the Trinity to essentially take its final form. Some would argue, however, that the controversy would only be settled in the west under the tutelage of the Cappadocian Fathers (roughly 330-395 A.D.) when it really blossomed into its final form.

Now in this instance we are only talking about the Trinity, but we could also open up discussion as to why it took until the Reformation to come up with the so-called 5 solas: Sola scriptura ("by Scripture alone"); Sola fide ("by faith alone"); Sola gratia ("by grace alone"); Solus Christus or Solo Christo ("Christ alone" or "through Christ alone"); and Soli Deo gloria ("glory to God alone"). The point being, that on such an important and controversial subject as Hell, we have shut the door without having defined its parameters. It is one thing to say that, ‘Yes, there is a Hell and bad people go there,” but quite another to identify all of these bad people as those who do not agree with our little small brand of Christianity. Perhaps, we are right, but there are millions of Hindus, Buddhists, and yes, even Muslims that deserve to be told why. That we have not effectively answered yet.

JimR__/

Personally, I don’t recall any other time that American politics has disturbed me anymore than these days. Defamation of character seems to be the order of the day. Call your opponent a big fat slob, or a liar, or any other childish name you wish and your ratings go up.


No, I am not just talking about the Donald, either. There are exceptions, but their rating are in the single digits. Listen carefully and you will find as many Democrats squealing as you do Republicans using the same ad hominem attacks. Yes, I know Jesus called Creaser an old fox, but can you think of a better description? Nonetheless, when perfectly decent men and women are vilified it is to me a different proposition altogether.

That aside, however, the news media goads and baits politicians for the sole purpose of ratings or advertising revenue which only accentuates the frenzy. It’s all about the money. Further, it seems that a politician’s moral character is secondary for some of our larger churches and universities. Everybody wants to be on the winner’s side, it seems. Compromise, particularly when money is involved, seems to be the name of the game.

What a crazy topsy-turvy world!

Our degenerate political correctness has conveniently hidden the awfulness of the morning after pill under the euphemism of “emergency postcoital contraception” and the killing of the innocents as “prochoice”—it’s a woman’s right, you know. What rubbish. Moreover, for the P. C. crowd Islamic jihadist must not be referred to as Muslim extremists, or in any constructive way be linked to the source of its putrid origins. Again, what rubbish.

Yet, even now we are faced with another jihadist attack from terrorists born, raised in and protected by the ostensibly peace loving Muslims in the Molenbeek section of Brussels. After all, grandma’s home or the neighbor next door has proven to be a safer haven than the streets of Europe, so why not stick close to home and enjoy a fine home cooked meal and the camaraderie of old pals? By the way, when is the last time you have heard of peace loving Muslims turning one jihadist in? I can’ think of one. Perhaps, it’s high time for us to distinguish between complacency and peace loving. I’m just saying.

Once more, what a crazy topsy-turvy world!

As you know, currently I am in Beijing which surprisingly has a thriving and open Christian community as well as a large ethnic Muslim population throughout the rest of the country. Speaking of Chinese Muslims, I’m no expert but I can’t imagine China’s leadership losing any sleep over Guantanamo if the shoe were on the other foot. Surely there must be a lesson in all of this. Could it be that murder and mayhem parading under the banner of Islam requires swift and severe punishment?

Granted the Scriptures declares: 

He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God? (ESV)

But what justice, however, is there for an unrepentant heart? Release the jihadist from Guantanamo and what do you get? Just another jihadist on the loose, as far as I can see. So, perhaps, just perhaps, it is best to stick with Scripture on this one:

“For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy (James 2:13).”

Sound harsh? I hope not. But we must be realistic, and we must be practical.

On the practical side and on another matter, I would suggest that vetting extremism is an ongoing task; and if you or your religious persuasion is detrimental to the state, potentially or otherwise, you lose your right to practice your particular brand of fanaticism. Naturally there must be a balance in all of this, but I am not sure we in the west have come up with a solution. Now, don’t misread me on this, the real test is in determining who the real extremist are. Cherry picking for individual jihadist in the process at this point is for all practical purposes impossible. Therefore, in my opinion, vetting individuals is secondary to vetting the sectarian system in which these fanatics thrive. Until we are able to successfully do that, we are in for a heap of trouble.

Need I say more?

As a voter most Christians are increasingly caught in a Catch-22 between the lesser of 2 evils. On the one hand the choice is an abortion advocate and proven incompetent, and on the other someone who quite well may just as well take us to the brink of Armageddon and beyond. Truth is there is no moral majority to fall back on either—that is, if there ever was one.

There is, however, one comforting fact, that I find in Acts 17:26 which reads:

“From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands.”

To me, this undeniably declares that God is in ultimate control and He sets the course of history and will keep it on track until the very end. We have the privilege and opportunity to play the roles as we see fit, but He has written the play. And, in the end, God wins.

Well, I’ve gone out on a limb on this one, but it is not the first time. And, quite frankly, on this one, I had just as soon be proven wrong.

Yours in the Bonds of Calvary,

JimR_/-

"Status quo? ... that's Latin for the mess we's in."

Not only do the political elite refuse to label Islamic terrorism for what it is, during the middle of one of the largest terror attacks ever the President dances the tango and goes to a baseball game with a dictator. Again, what a topsy-turvy world!

I remember once an old black man being asked what the word "status quo" meant; without hesitation he reply, "Oh, that's an easy one. That's Latin for the mess we's in." His grammar may have been off but there is a world of wisdom in that definition. We's in a mess, that's for sure.

As a friends just posted, "Okay .... it's not funny anymore. Where's the real presidential candidates?" Have ever seen anything so silly in all your life? Any candidate with any lick of sense whatsoever is buried in the polls. Knocked out not by common sense but with remarks such as "low energy' or 'who would vote for a face like that?' or by calling someone a lair without one shred of evidence whatsoever. Better yet letting a known adulterer smear another candidates by innuendo alone. The name of the game seems to be “If it works, use it!” Trouble is how can we trust anyone with such moral ineptitude? Believe me there’s enough blame to go around on both sides of the aisle.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I blame the mess we’s in on Christians who refuse to join in on the process and get out and vote, and quit kowtowing to political correctness. The whole system is corrupt from most of the Supreme Court right through Congress and most certainty throughout the Administration. When are we going to begin to judge these people by the fruit they bear? It’s one thing to get up on Easter morning and put on an “I love Jesus” face, and quite another to live the life day in and day out. People make mistakes that’s for sure, and I can’t fault them for that. But most Christians I know seek forgiveness, not just from God but from one another. I may have missed it, but I have failed to hear one candidate apologize either to God or man for the antics that are going on in this Ringling Brother’s Circus that we call a political campaign.

Believe it or not, one of my hobbies is to collect clowns. I have the in all shapes and forms. All the way from some priceless Emmett Kelly’s to some that I happen to run across in second hand stores and garage sales. One of my favorites is a windup carrousel of clowns dancing to the tune of “Bring on the Clowns.” I’m tempted to bring it out each evening when I watch the evening news coverage on this present political season. But again that’s not necessary because they seem to come out on their own and dance their own goofy dance. As a New York Yankee would say, “Enough, already!”

Oh to God that we had a few John the Baptists, or Isaiahs. Perhaps just even one reluctant Jonah might do. Where are they? Most Christians I see are hiding behind their political correctness, or timidity or complacency, or whatever. They are certainly not making any waves. That’s for sure. Now, I not advocating taking on each candidate one by one and pointing out their flaws. That’s not necessary. It’s the system that I’m after. The cultural relativism. The “I don’t care as long as it doesn’t affect my pocket book" mentality, that what I’m talking about. Perhaps the rich fool is an appropriate parable here (Luke 12:13-21).

Now, it’s obvious that the America public at large is fed up with the status quo. Problem is most don’t have the answer. They keep looking in the wrong places. So until America and Western civilization has a deep moral rebirth in my opinion we are doomed. I challenge you, visit China if you disagree; or even an up and coming India. Economically we are going to be slam-dunked in the not too distant future if we’re not careful. Forget Mexico and Japan and the likes. These giants will dwarf them all.

I’m personally not a dooms day guy. I am by nature optimistic. However, I do have to call it like it is, as far as I can see it.

Again, I hope I’m wrong on this one, but my gut feeling is that I am not.

I am yours, however for a brighter future, 

JimR_/

Will the real bigot please standup!

The Oxford International Dictionary defines a bigot:

“as a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.”

That being the case, why should Christians and other otherwise law abiding citizens take the rap for bigotry when the liberals are actually more intolerant than those who hold conflicting political and/or moral views than they do?

For instance, when’s the last time you saw those opposed to same-sex marriages, or trans-gender bath rooms shut down a college campus or sit down in the middle of a busy interstate highway to show their opposition? Or, entire companies refusing to do business with those that are not “politically correct”? Also, is it not bigotry to fine a Catholic fined $13,000 for refusing to host same-sex ‘wedding’ at their farm. If that is not bigotry, pray tell me what is. What about the Little Sisters of the Poor who are currently fighting an adjunction under the Obamacare to provide insurance to cover abortion? Is this not an outrage? Bigotry at its worst. Further, we cannot overlook the fact that many of our larger cities have mandated neutral gender bathrooms to accommodate transgender individuals over which we as the average citizen have no choice since it is their “Constitutional right!” Really? I would rather think of it as political correct tyranny at its worst. Also, what about the removal of historic monuments just for the sake of trying to erase the past to pacify ethnic and/or political minorities? Is this not historical revisionism and bigotry at its worst?  And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Further, do I like the Confederate flag? No, absolutely not. But I have friends who do and who incidentally as far as I can see are not bigots. They are just proud of being Southerners. On the other hand if someone wants to sing “I’m a Yankee Doodle Dandy” that’s fine with me, too

Well, while I am at it. I must say that black lives matter. I mean that from the bottom of my heart. But in the protest let’s include those dress in blue. As a matter of fact, let’s include all the senseless killings that are going on in America, and do something about it, rather than just talk. Certainly Second Amendment rights are part of our Constitution; however, to politicize those rights and allow suspected jihadists who are on the no-fly list who can still walk into a gun show and purchase an Uzi is total insanity. Yet, The Left who are otherwise in opposition to our Second Amendment rights will champion those rights to protect these potential murders because it is the political correct thing to do. We must not called them Muslim extremists or curb their "rights," either. It smacks too much of profiling, they argue. Really? You could use the same argument to release Charles Manson from prison since he never personally killed anyone. He didn't have to since he had others to do it for him; however, who would dare hand him an Uzi because it is his Constitutional right and we mustn't profile him? So, in my opinion, if and when a jihadist is caught redhanded advocating murder and mayhem, not only should he or she be placed on the no-fly list—better yet, they should be placed in a cell right next to Manson himself.

I am not prepared to say which way the scales will tip in the current polarization; however,  my bet is the economics will win over human freedom and that political correctness is only a convenient vehicle for the greedy and powerful to stay in office. Amazing isn’t it that PayPal has scrapped its North Carolina expansion plan over the state's new LGBT law depriving at least 400 new employees a job just to please the LGBT lobby; or that a host of other companies have taken similar positions? Sadly, this is all done under the disguise of patriotism—that is to say, it is the American way. Let freedom ring. Even if it does mean forcing your daughter or wife to share a bathroom with a sexual pervert.

C.S. Lewis usually didn’t have much to say about politics Yet in The Four Loves—his book on the variety of human loves—Lewis talked at length about the horrible damage that can be done by patriotism, or love of country. Citing examples of damage done in the name of patriotism, Lewis mentions the trampling of the rights of Native American tribes, the gas chambers of Nazi Germany, the sins of apartheid.

Lewis is right, An enforced misplaced patriotism that is driven to the far edge of idolatry, has always led to the enforcement of a fear-based ideology, and often to death. I might say in reflecting on this that a few years past one would have never imagined that our political system could or perhaps would lead us in this direction. All we must do, however, is to replace the words"gas chambers" with the words "abortionist's rooms;" or the words "native American" with words "conservative Christians" to sense the real possibility— you get the point. We may not be there yet, but all the signs are pointing in that scary direction.

Friends, we need to pray and work harder than ever before.

I am yours in the bonds of Calvary,

JimR_/

 

Staying relevant does not necessarily mean that you are contemporary.

Staying relevant does not necessarily mean that you are contemporary. Let me explain. There are those who argue that Christianity is flexible, it changes with the times. Naturally, they cite the plight of the slaves, and not only do they want to see this horrible practice condemned to fit in with modern contemporary, but they wish to eradicate the memory thereof by historical revisionism. Anything to do with the Confederacy is out and basically despised by the politically correct elite. Almost anything goes. Deface historical monuments, change the appearance of our currency, write off the entire South as just a bunch of Bubbas. Anything goes.

Now, don’t get me wrong. Harriet Tubman was a great lady and deserves her place in history, perhaps something similar to the Stone Mountain Park Monument in Georgia, or the Mount Rushmore National Memorial in South Dakota, along with other great black and minority leaders. Honor is not what this is all about. Cultural revisionism is, however.

There are other examples, too. President Obama apologizing about American’s arrogance and upper handedness in the past as many of the leftwing liberals are advocating —and if my hunch is right, he will come as close to apologize to Japan for America’s use of the Atomic bomb to end World War II as politically correct for him to do. As if I or anyone else could apologize for what my granddaddy did. Now, not only do these politically correct storm troopers want to rewrite past history, they also have the audacity to pre-write future history, also. If not, then pray tell me how anyone in their right mind can hand out a Nobel Peace Prize to someone on the basis of what they might do? Which, incidentally, gives us a hint on how far reaching this cultural revisionism is. In a nut shell, its sole purpose appears to be to eradicate Western civilization as we know it and replace with contemporary values.

It is a subtle moral revisionism, also. Anything is fair game. Piggy back the gay rights movement on the back of the Black Civil rights movement, that’s fine as long as it gets the job done. Give the ESPN Arthur Ashe Award for Courage to a transgender—more properly a transvestite—like Caitlyn Jenner is simply just another example in a long list of misguided value judgments that these purveyors of moral contemporaneity who will go to any lengths to muddy the waters of spiritual sanity.

Yes, America made mistakes in the past. Big mistakes. These we cannot ignore. However, to write off the use of nuclear weaponry to end Second World War as great moral blunder is simply not true. For sure it was the lesser of two evils but a choice had to be made, and it was. Only at the judgement seat of Christ will the truth be known, however.

 Take care!