Sunday, January 15, 2017

The Praxis of Scripture

Truth is not a work in progress; theology is however. We proud Protestants who insist on sola Scriptura—opposed to prima Scriptura—have painted ourselves into an unnecessary corner with very little wiggle room to escape.   The problem is that tradition is important, and in many respects absolutely necessary. Take for instance the doctrine of the Trinity, where would we be without the Council of Nicea (325 AD) followed by the Councils of Chalcedon (451 AD) and Ephesus (431 AD) which hammer out the finer details of the functions of the Godhead? In this regard, it can be shown that opinions based solely on Scripture were all over the map, depending on which cleric interpreted those verses. The Orthodox—which I consider myself to be—insisted, however, that private interpretation was a sure road to ruin and the junk heap of heresy.

Fortunately for us, tradition (just another term for the history of Orthodoxy) stepped in and insisted that “No, Jesus was not only just like God; but God Himself, or otherwise we end up with two Gods or simply a created son with a beginning prior to our creation.” And, believe it or not each position can be supported by cherry picking the Bible.

The wiser heads when presented with such contradictions, however, insisted that both Old and New Covenants taught that God is One. For sure it is a mystery, but one worth delving into without sacrificing this core principle. Thank God, they did so, because during the process these holy men of God established the canon and a whole lot of necessary doctrine along the way. 

For the truth of the matter is that we had neither a defined canon of Scripture or Trinitarian creed prior to this—as a matter of fact, history tells us that the word “Trinity” was not even in the vocabulary of the Primitive Church or at the very best after the first two centuries. So, we are, indeed, obligated to tradition for that. We should not be afraid of the word “tradition,” either—it’s in the Bible; whereas, the word “Trinity” is not. We’re not talking about the tradition of men (Colossians 2:8; Titus 1:14)—Scripture and common sense condemns that—we’re talking about Godly tradition (2 Thessalonians 2:15), the kind that young Timothy learned at the feet of Paul (2 Timothy 1:5) or that which he tucked away in his heart as heard from his grandmother.

The Assemblies of God’s official position on Scripture is as follows:
The Scriptures, both the Old and New Testaments, are verbally inspired of God and are the revelation of God to man, the infallible, authoritative rule of faith and conduct.



With all of this in mind, I think it can be safely said that it was God through the working and discernment of the Church that gave us the Scriptures and not the other way around. It may also be stated without fear of contradiction that the New Testament Church existed before the New Testament books. Therefore, we are once again reminded that, indeed, the church of the living God, is the pillar and foundation of the truth (1 Timothy 3:15).

No comments: